A US citizen in Toronto buys a Canadian index fund through her bank. A US green-card holder in Mumbai still holds the mutual funds he bought before he moved. A father in New Jersey opens a fund in his kids’ names back in India.

None of them did anything aggressive. None of them think of these as exotic. And all three are now holding what US tax law calls a Passive Foreign Investment Company — a PFIC — with a reporting form attached to each one.

The label is the problem, and the label is almost automatic. A foreign corporation is a PFIC if 75% or more of its income is passive, or 50% or more of its assets produce passive income. A pooled fund — a mutual fund, an ETF, most ULIPs — exists to hold passive assets. So a foreign-domiciled fund is, by design, a PFIC. Not as a penalty. As a definition. The rules worked exactly as written; the investor just didn’t know the rule existed.

What follows from the label is where it gets expensive.

If you do nothing — make no election — you land in the default regime. When you eventually sell or take a distribution, the gain isn’t taxed as a normal capital gain. It’s spread back across every year you held the fund, taxed at the highest ordinary rate for each of those years, and charged interest on top. A long-held position can see a large share of its gain consumed by tax and interest that compounded silently while nothing appeared to be wrong.

There are two elections that can pull you out of that default. One taxes you each year on your share of the fund’s earnings, but it depends on the fund handing you a specific annual statement — and many foreign funds simply don’t produce one. The other taxes you each year on the change in the fund’s market value, but only works for funds that trade on a qualifying exchange. Which doors are open depends on facts you don’t control: what the fund issues, where it trades. The election you’d want may not be available to you at all.

Then there’s the part that turns a small holding into a large problem.

The reporting form for a PFIC has no minimum dollar floor of its own once it’s required, and — this is the quiet one — a return that should have included a required PFIC form and didn’t can stay open to audit indefinitely.

Indefinitely.

Not three years. Not six. The clock that normally closes the door on an old return doesn’t start. One unreported foreign fund, held quietly for years, can leave the entire return — every line of it, not just the fund — examinable long after you’d assume it was settled.

And the most common version of the mistake isn’t hiding anything. It’s reporting the dividend from the fund on the return and assuming that covered it. It didn’t. The income line and the PFIC form are two different obligations. Declaring the income does not satisfy the form.

This is the loud-versus-quiet split that runs through cross-border tax. The failures people brace for are loud — a letter, an audit notice, a number with a dollar sign. The one that actually costs the most is quiet: a form that was required, never filed, on a fund nobody flagged, holding a door open that everyone assumed had closed years ago.

The harder cases are the ones where nobody asked the right question. A fund bought before moving to the US, still held after the move. A fund opened in a child’s name, which doesn’t feel like “your foreign financial assets” — but the reporting question doesn’t care whose name is on it. A retirement-style or insurance-wrapped product whose treatment is genuinely unsettled and needs a specialist’s read, not a guess.

Meanwhile, the cost of fixing the common case — a non-willful failure, caught up voluntarily before the IRS makes contact — is bounded and knowable, the opposite of an audit window that never closes. The Math Nobody Runs: What Compliance Costs vs. What Non-Compliance Costs puts both columns side by side.

If you hold a foreign fund, the question to sit with isn’t “do I owe tax on it” — it might be zero. It’s “is there a form attached to it that I’ve never filed, and what is that quietly keeping open?”

See also: “I Owe Nothing, So I Don’t Need to File” — the Most Expensive Sentence in Expat Tax and Checking “No” on the Foreign-Accounts Question — How One Checkbox Becomes Evidence Against You.

← Back to Common Mistakes · The Guide